|
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES.
j No. 88.
JOHN BARRON, SURVIVOR, &c., USE OF L. TIERNAN, &c.,
PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
VERSUS
THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE.
IN XRBOR TO THE COUBT OF APPEALS FOR THE WESTER* SHORE OF THK STATE OF MABI1AKD.
INDEX.
Original. Print.
Writ of error................................................................1........1
Citation..................................................................3........2
Bond..................................................................5........2
Declaration............................................................10..
General issue......................................................... 13..
Verdict..............................................................14..
Motion in arrest of judgment............................................ 14.
Motion overruled—judgment of county court. ...........................15.
Defendant's first bill of exceptions.......................................15.
Do. second do do...........................................33.
Do. third do do...........................................34.
Assignment or' errors in court of appeals....................................35.
..6
..9
.10
.10
.10
.11
.26
.27
.28
Joinder in error.............................................. .........36.......29
Judgment of court of appeals.......................... ..............."..37.......29
Clerk's certificate......................................................39..... ...31
UNITED STATES o» AMERICA, ss. — The President of the United States
to the honorable the Judges of the court of appeals for the western
shore of the State of Maryland, greeting:
_ Because in the record and proceedings, as also in the rendition of the
judgment of a plea which is in the said court of appeals for the western
shore of the State of Maryland, being the highest court of law or equity of
the said State in which a decision in the suit could be had, before you or
some of you, between the mayor and city council of Baltimore, appellants,
*nd John Barron, appellee, on appeal from a judgment of the county court
naltimore county, wherein was drawn in question the validity of an au-
wonty exercised under the State of Maryland, on the ground of its being
pugnant to the Constitution of the United States, and the decision of the
|
